Saturday, October 28, 2023

Cultural Capital - Bourdieu

Cultural Capital

While he didn’t consider himself a Marxist sociologist, the theories of Karl Marx heavily influenced Bourdieu’s thinking. Marx’s influence is perhaps most evident in Bourdieu’s theory of cultural capital. Like Marx, Bourdieu argued that capital formed the foundation of social life and dictated one’s position within the social order. For Bourdieu and Marx both, the more capital one has, the more powerful a position one occupies in social life. However, Bourdieu extended Marx’s idea of capital beyond the economic and into the more symbolic realm of culture.

Bourdieu’s concept of cultural capital refers to the collection of symbolic elements such as skills, tastes, posture, clothing, mannerisms, material belongings, credentials, etc. that one acquires through being part of a particular social class. Sharing similar forms of cultural capital with others—the same taste in movies, for example, or a degree from an Ivy League School—creates a sense of collective identity and group position (“people like us”). But Bourdieu also points out that cultural capital is a major source of social inequality. Certain forms of cultural capital are valued over others, and can help or hinder one’s social mobility just as much as income or wealth.

According to Bourdieu, cultural capital comes in three forms—embodied, objectified, and institutionalized. One’s accent or dialect is an example of embodied cultural capital, while a luxury car or record collection are examples of cultural capital in its objectified state. In its institutionalized form, cultural capital refers to credentials and qualifications such as degrees or titles that symbolize cultural competence and authority.

Friday, May 8, 2020

Sociological Terms

  • Role conflict
  • Trained incapacity
  • Self-fulfilling prophecy
  • Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft (Community and Society)


Friday, March 28, 2014

बड़े होते शहर

जब भोपाल शहर में गुम होती रिवायतों के बारे में जानकारी इकट्ठा कर रही थी, उसी दौरान मैंने समझा था, बड़े होते शहर बड़े होने के क्रम में सबसे पहले अपनी सरलता खो देते हैं। अपनी सहजता, अपनी अपनाइयत। ... वे दूसरों के दुख और सुख को पास से छूने की क्षमता का लोप कर देते हैं। रिश्तों में बदलाव, सिर्फ़ पारिवारिक स्तर पर नहीं होता, बल्कि आपका पड़ोस भी आपका अवांतर समाज हो जाता है। बातचीत और रोज़मर्रा की गप्प के अड्डों के एड्रेस बदल जाते हैं। नाई, सब्जीवाला, मिठाईवाला अब आपके बतियाने का सुख नहीं उठाते, बल्कि जल्दी-जल्दी आपके काम को निबटा, अगले ग्राहक से मुख़ातिब होते हैं। सबकुछ प्रोफ़ेशनल हो जाता है। रिश्तों कि मीठी आँच मद्धिम हो जाती है और प्रतियोगिता का सुरूर पेशानियों पर रेखाएँ खींचने लगता है।
- वन्दना राग (एक संस्मरण 'इलाहाबाद के पथ पर...' से , 'नया ज्ञानोदय', फरवरी 14)

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Global vs Local

... ग्लोबल कल्चर से टकराव की स्थितियों में स्थानीय चीजें दम तोड़ देती हैं...

- वन्दना राग (एक संस्मरण 'इलाहाबाद के पथ पर...' से , 'नया ज्ञानोदय', फरवरी 14)

Thursday, November 8, 2012

Risk Society and Reflexivity

'Risk Society' and 'Reflexivity' -  Sociological terms used by Anthony Giddens and Ulrich Beck in reference to modernity.



Ulrich Beck argues that we live in an age characterised by risks that are of human creation, where the ethic of “individual self-fulfilment and achievement is the most powerful current in modern society” (Beck, 2000, p 165). For Beck, the sources of collective identity and meaning that used to underpin the western industrial democracies – family, national state, ethnicity, class and job – are exhausted and no longer provide for either personal security or social integration (Beck, 1992).


German social theorist Ulrich Beck has argued that western societies are becoming increasingly individualised, in the sense that people’s life courses and consequent bodies of experience are increasingly differentiated, and that people also prize autonomy and choice as key life objects (Beck, 2000).